Unity Editor CVE-2025-59489: Brief Summary of Untrusted Search Path and LFI Vulnerability

This post provides a brief summary of CVE-2025-59489, a high-severity untrusted search path and local file inclusion vulnerability affecting Unity Editor 2019.1 through 6000.3. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to exploit file loading mechanisms via crafted local applications, impacting Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux builds. Includes affected version details, technical mechanism, and detection strategies.
CVE Analysis

13 min read

ZeroPath CVE Analysis

ZeroPath CVE Analysis

2025-10-03

Unity Editor CVE-2025-59489: Brief Summary of Untrusted Search Path and LFI Vulnerability
Experimental AI-Generated Content

This CVE analysis is an experimental publication that is completely AI-generated. The content may contain errors or inaccuracies and is subject to change as more information becomes available. We are continuously refining our process.

If you have feedback, questions, or notice any errors, please reach out to us.

[email protected]

Introduction

Unity-based games and applications on Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux have been exposed to a high-severity vulnerability for years, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code or escalate privileges through unsafe file loading. With Unity powering about 70 percent of top mobile games and countless cross-platform apps, the impact of CVE-2025-59489 is broad and significant for the software industry.

Unity Technologies is a global leader in game engine development, providing the backbone for major titles like Among Us and Pokémon GO. Their engine is used not only in gaming but also in enterprise, education, and simulation, making vulnerabilities in Unity runtime a risk for a wide range of sectors.

Technical Information

CVE-2025-59489 is a vulnerability in Unity Editor versions 2019.1 through 6000.3 that allows attackers to exploit untrusted search path and local file inclusion mechanisms. The root cause is Unity's improper handling of the -xrsdk-pre-init-library command-line argument. This argument was intended to allow legitimate pre-initialization of native libraries but can be abused to load attacker-controlled libraries from arbitrary locations.

When a Unity application is launched with this argument, it attempts to load the specified library without validating its origin or integrity. This creates a CWE-426 untrusted search path scenario. Attackers can exploit this by placing a malicious library where the application can access it and launching the Unity app with the crafted argument. On Android, a malicious app can extract its own native libraries and trigger a Unity app with the vulnerable argument. On Windows, if a Unity app registers a custom URI handler, remote exploitation is possible by crafting a URI that passes the malicious argument.

The vulnerability enables arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the Unity application, which can include sensitive permissions or access to user data. No public code snippets are available for this vulnerability. The flaw is present in all Unity Editor versions from 2019.1 up to and including 6000.3.

Detection Methods

Detecting unauthorized code execution within Unity applications requires a multifaceted approach, combining static and dynamic analysis techniques to identify potential vulnerabilities and malicious activities.

Static Analysis Techniques:

  1. Code Obfuscation and Encryption: Implementing code obfuscation tools can make it more challenging for attackers to reverse-engineer Unity applications. By obfuscating code, developers can conceal the logic and structure of their applications, thereby reducing the risk of unauthorized code execution. (thegabmeister.com)

  2. Integrity Verification: Incorporating integrity checks during the build process can help detect unauthorized modifications to the application's codebase. This involves generating and verifying cryptographic hashes of the application's files to ensure they have not been tampered with. (jikguard.com)

Dynamic Analysis Techniques:

  1. Runtime Monitoring: Deploying runtime monitoring tools can help detect anomalies during the execution of Unity applications. These tools can monitor for unexpected behaviors, such as unauthorized memory access or code injection attempts, and trigger alerts or defensive actions when such activities are detected. (appdome.com)

  2. Behavioral Analysis: Analyzing the behavior of Unity applications in a controlled environment can help identify potential vulnerabilities. By observing how the application interacts with system resources and external inputs, security researchers can detect patterns indicative of malicious activities. (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs):

  • Unexpected network communications initiated by the Unity application.
  • Presence of unknown or unauthorized DLLs or shared libraries loaded during runtime.
  • Unusual memory usage patterns or access violations.
  • Alterations in the application's behavior, such as crashes or unexpected outputs.

Monitoring Guidance:

  • Log Analysis: Regularly review application logs for signs of unauthorized access or anomalies.
  • System Calls Monitoring: Monitor system calls made by the Unity application to detect unauthorized operations.
  • File Integrity Monitoring: Implement file integrity monitoring to detect unauthorized changes to the application's files.

By integrating these detection methods, developers and security professionals can enhance the security posture of Unity applications and mitigate the risks associated with unauthorized code execution.

References for detection: flatt.tech, thegabmeister.com, jikguard.com, appdome.com, onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Affected Systems and Versions

  • Unity Editor versions 2019.1 through 6000.3 are affected.
  • All applications built with these Unity Editor versions are vulnerable.
  • Platforms impacted: Android, Windows, macOS, Linux.
  • Exploitation possible via crafted local applications and, on Windows, via custom URI handlers.

Vendor Security History

Unity Technologies has a history of addressing vulnerabilities quickly and transparently. Previous issues include log4j-related vulnerabilities and other engine-level flaws. The company operates a bug bounty program and coordinates with external researchers for responsible disclosure. Security advisories and updates are published regularly, with fixes provided for both current and out-of-support versions when necessary.

References

Detect & fix
what others miss